Back To Blog

FOX vs. RockShox: Mountain bike fork guide

By Bruce Lin


Fox vs Rockshox forks
We often get asked, "What's the difference between FOX and RockShox forks?" It's a common question when shopping for a mountain bike, and the answer isn't straightforward. 

We can't definitively answer whether one fork manufacturer is “better” than the other (sorry). Instead, this guide aims to explore the history of the two brands, the technology they use, and what features their forks offer. It will also consider World Cup race results and the brands' popularity among our customers. 

Key points when comparing Fox and RockShox

- Fox produced its first mountain bike suspension fork in 2001. RockShox broke ground with one of the first production MTB suspension forks in 1989.
- Both Fox and RockShox offer a range of suspension forks from lightweight XC race forks to long-travel downhill forks.
- Fox product hierarchy: Rhythm, Performance, Performance Elite, Factory (entry level to high-end, respectively).
- RockShox product hierarchy: RC/RL/Select, RCT3/RLC/Select+, Ultimate (entry level to high end, respectively).
- Results: RockShox dominates World Cup XC, while Fox is tops in World Cup DH racing. 
- TPC sales: We sell slightly more Fox fork-equipped bikes than RockShox bikes.

Okay, ready for a deep dive on mountain bike forks?

To keep things simple, we'll focus on the most common forks that FOX and RockShox produce. Most later model year bikes offered in our inventory will come equipped with a fork detailed in this guide. 




FOX Factory, Inc.

FOX came from the world of moto suspension. In the 1970s, long-travel suspension was revolutionizing the motocross industry, but the technology for achieving it was still developing. FOX's founder, Bob Fox, was an amateur motocross racer and a mechanical engineer. He saw a golden opportunity to enter the market. In 1974, he opened a small business distributing suspension components.

Bob Fox had a particular interest in designing an air spring shock that would help prevent bottom-outs and make adjusting spring rates easier. Drawings for his prototype ‘FOX AirShox’ shock were done by hand and he built the first shock in a friend’s garage using a mill and a manual lathe. After a year of development, the first production run of the FOX AirShox was ready in 1975. Fox sold 200 shocks that year.

Racers using the new FOX AirShox went on to win the AMA 500cc National Motocross Championship in 1976 and 1977. After these back to back championships, sales exploded to over 10,000 units and FOX was firmly established as a premier suspension company in the motocross world. FOX Factory, Inc. (often referred to in the industry as ‘Fox Racing Shox’) was incorporated in 1978.

Fox Factory racing shox historyThe FOX AirShox (top left) and founder Bob Fox (bottom right) | Photos courtesy Fox Factory, Inc. 

Over the years, FOX has diversified into various other high-performance sports, including off-road racing trucks, road racing cars, road racing motorcycles, and snowmobiles. FOX made its first bicycle shock prototype in 1991 and entered the mountain bike market in 1992 with an original equipment manufacturer (OEM) rear shock produced for Cannondale. OEM partnerships with Specialized and Trek followed soon after.

FOX arrived relatively late to the mountain bike fork market and didn’t produce its first suspension fork until 2001. However, this first fork was immediately innovative due to its stiffer 32mm stanchions (other forks at the time were no larger than 30mm). This added rigidity came at the right time. Like motocross in the 1970s, mountain biking was beginning to go through its own long-travel suspension revolution and FOX was at the forefront.

Fox Tail vs. Fox Head

Many mountain bikers may be unaware that FOX (suspension) and Fox (apparel) are different companies. There's a reason the two brands have the same name. Bob Fox, founder of Fox Factory, Inc. (suspension) and Geoff Fox, founder of Fox Head Inc. (apparel) are brothers and both have a history of racing and developing motocross suspension and equipment. They were involved in each other’s businesses in the early years but eventually incorporated separately.

To differentiate between the two brands many will refer to Fox Factory, Inc. the suspension company as Fox Racing Shox or more colloquially, “Fox Tail,” and Fox Head Inc. the action sports apparel company as Fox Racing or “Fox Head.” Products are easy to differentiate by logos which use a foxtail (suspension) and a fox head (apparel).

RockShox Inc.

Like Fox, RockShox founder, Paul Turner got his start with motorcycles, which he raced as a teenager in the 1970s. By the time he was 18, he had started his own company selling aftermarket motorcycle engine parts. Turner quickly advanced to working as a factory mechanic for Honda’s pro motocross team and as a consultant for Honda R&D. He began racing triathlons and mountain bikes after moving to Northern California to work with Honda.

Paul Turner RockShox Mountain Bike forks RS-1Paul Turner with an early RockShox RS-1

As a motocross rider, Turner was accustomed to plush suspension. Rigid mountain bikes felt harsh and archaic in comparison. He began working on a simple, modified, lightweight motorcycle fork which evolved into the first generation of RockShox products. In 1987, with the help of Keith Bontrager, Turner created a prototype mountain bike with front and rear suspension for an industry trade show.

The other half of Rockshox, Stephen Simons, was an entrepreneur and also a veteran motorcycle racer. In 1974, Simons worked for Moto-X Fox (Geoff Fox's company which originally distributed the FOX AirShox) with Bob and Geoff Fox, and he was involved in the design and testing of the first FOX AirShox. Simons went on to found his own company, Simons Inc., developing suspension modifications and front forks.

After building his first prototype, Paul Turner began building his suspension components in his garage using Simons Inc. parts. In 1989, Turner approached Stephen Simons to lend his manufacturing expertise to a bicycle suspension idea that became the genesis of the RockShox brand. Simons became the president of the new company that year.

Greg Herbold DH World Championship RockShox RS1Herbold's Championship-winning Miyata with an early RockShox fork.

The next two years were highly successful for RockShox. Turner brought Greg Herbold aboard as a RockShox test rider and company spokesperson. At the inaugural UCI Mountain Bike World Championships in 1990, Herbold became the first downhill world champion on a bike equipped with one of the first RockShox suspension forks and Ned Overend became the first Cross-Country World Champion riding a Specialized-branded RockShox fork. That same year, RockShox released its first production suspension fork called the RS-1.

The world's second-largest component company, SRAM, acquired RockShox in 2002. RockShox is currently part of SRAM Corporation.


Suspension forks

The vast majority of mountain bikes that you find for sale will come equipped with a FOX or RockShox fork on the list below. Different forks offer travel anywhere from 100mm to 180mm (measured in 10mm increments) depending on a fork's intended use. With few exceptions, most forks are available in 27.5" and 29" wheel versions. The sections below will explain other specific features in greater detail.

Fox 34 36 and RockShox mountain bike forks(Note: the information in this guide will apply to recent model year bikes and forks. Older products may have different specifications.)

FOX MTB forks

FOX fork models are named based on stanchion diameter. Forks are available in Rhythm, Performance, Performance Elite, and Factory trims (see the FOX Performance Hierarchy). Rhythm and Performance level forks use the FIT GRIP damper. Performance Elite and Factory level forks use the FIT4 or FIT GRIP2 dampers. (See FOX Dampers).

FOX 32
The FOX 32 is FOX’s standard XC fork. It uses 32mm stanchions to keep weight low. Travel: 100-120mm

FOX 32 Step-Cast
The 32 Step-Cast fork is lighter than the standard FOX 32. It has narrower lowers and a notable “step” at the bottom of the lowers to reduce material and weight. Travel: 100mm

FOX 34
The FOX 34 is FOX’s trail fork. It is one of the most popular trail forks on the market. It uses 34mm stanchions. In terms of weight and stiffness, it splits the difference between the FOX 32 and the FOX 36. Travel: 120-150mm

FOX 34 Step-Cast
The 34 Step-Cast is lighter than the standard FOX 34. It uses a notable “step” at the bottom of the lowers to reduce material and weight. It is comparable in weight to many XC forks but is stiffer due to the 34mm stanchions. Travel: 100-120mm

FOX 36
The FOX 36 is FOX’s enduro fork. It uses 36mm stanchions for greater stiffness. The Factory and Performance Elite level FOX 36s are available with the gravity focused FIT GRIP2 damper. Travel: 140-180mm

*2021 Update* - The 2021 FOX 36 will be available with 150-160mm travel for both 27.5" and 29" wheelsizes. It has a new stiffer chassis similar to the 2021 FOX 38 and FOX 40. 

FOX 38
The FOX 38 is new for 2021. It is FOX's latest long travel single crown fork for enduro applications. It uses a new elliptical inner shape to the steerer tube to increase stiffness and a new chassis with a round arch. It also features the same air bleed valves as the FOX 40. Travel: 160-180mm 

FOX 40 / FOX 49
The FOX 40 is FOX’s dual crown downhill fork. It uses 40mm stanchions for maximum stiffness. It also has special bleed valves on the lowers that allow you to burp air trapped under the seals and improve suppleness. The FOX 49 is a FOX 40 designed for use with 29” wheels. The FOX 40 / FOX 49 is only available in Performance and Factory trim levels. Performance forks are OEM only. Travel: 180-200mm 

*2021 Update* - the FOX 49 name is gone for 2021, and new 29" and 27.5" DH forks use the FOX 40 name. It has been updated with a new, stiffer chassis design.

RockShox MTB forks

For cross country, trail and enduro forks, RockShox offers both a higher-end and entry-level option to suit different rider needs and budgets. The main difference between higher-end and entry-level forks is the damper (see RockShox Dampers). Cross country forks are available in RL, RLC, Select, Select+, and Ultimate trims. Trail and enduro forks are available in RC, RCT2, RC2, Select, Select+, and Ultimate trims. (See the RockShox Performance Hierarchy.)

RockShox SID
The SID is RockShox’s high-end XC fork. It has 32mm stanchions and prioritizes light weight. It uses the Charger 2 damper. Travel: 100-120mm

*2021 Update* - The 2021 SID has been split into two models — the SID SL and the SID Ultimate. The SID SL is XC focused. It has a new crown, steerer, stanchions, and chassis optimized for lighter weight and 100mm of travel. The SID Ultimate uses stiffer 35mm stanchions and has 120mm of travel. It is designed to be a lightweight trail fork for light trail and aggressive XC.  

RockShox Reba
The Reba is RockShox’s entry-level XC fork. It has 32mm stanchions and prioritizes light weight. It uses the Motion Control damper. Travel: 100-120mm

RockShox RS-1
The RS1 is a unique “upside-down” XC fork. This means the stanchions are at the bottom, which is opposite most single-crown forks. In theory, this can increase stiffness where the fork mounts to the bike, the point of highest leverage. The RS1 is named after RockShox’s first production fork. It has a full carbon chassis and steerer. It requires a front wheel with a proprietary RS1 specific “Predictive Steering” front hub. Travel: 100-120mm

RockShox Pike
The Pike is RockShox’s high-end trail fork. It uses 35mm stanchions for increased stiffness. It uses the Charger 2 or the Charger 2.1 damper. Travel: 120-160mm

RockShox Revelation
The Revelation is RockShox’s entry-level trail fork. It uses 35mm stanchions for increased stiffness. It uses the Motion Control or the Charger RC damper. Travel: 120-160mm

RockShox Lyrik
The Lyrik is RockShox’s high-end enduro fork. It uses 35mm stanchions like the Pike, but the stanchion walls are thicker to provide greater stiffness. It uses the Charger 2 or the Charger 2.1 damper. Travel: 150-180mm

RockShox Yari
The Yari is RockShox’s entry-level enduro fork. It uses the same 35mm stanchion chassis used by the previous generation Lyrik. It uses the Motion Control or the Charger RC damper. Travel: 150-180mm

RockShox BoXXer
The BoXXer is RockShox’s dual crown downhill fork. It uses 35mm stanchions. It uses the Charger 2 or Charger 2.1 damper. Travel: 180-200mm

RockShox Bluto
The Bluto is RockShox's fat bike specific fork. It’s based on the 32mm stanchion Reba chassis but widened to accommodate 26" fat bike tires up to 4.8” wide. It uses the Motion Control damper. It comes in RL with a lockout or RLT3 with three pedal modes. Travel: 80-120mm

Note: RockShox offers other budget-oriented forks (e.g., 30, Recon, Sektor, Judy) not described in this list. They are less common in our inventory, however, so they have been omitted.


Fork performance hierarchy

Both FOX and RockShox have various fork trims and use specific naming conventions to denote the performance these trims offer. Higher-end forks will cost more, but they generally offer lighter weight and/or better damper performance (see more about dampers). 


The trim of FOX forks accompanies the model name to describe its performance level. E.g., the FOX 34 can come as a FOX 34 Rhythm, FOX 34 Performance, FOX  34 Performance Elite, or a FOX 34 Factory. 

Entry Level: Rhythm
FOX Rhythm forks are original equipment (OEM) forks that only come on complete bikes and are generally not available to be purchased aftermarket. Rhythm forks use a FIT GRIP damper that is slightly less adjustable and less complicated. The lower legs are cast from aluminum to keep costs down.

Entry-Mid Level: Performance
Performance forks use a FIT GRIP damper. The cast lowers are magnesium, the same construction as the higher end forks.

Mid-High End: Performance Elite
Performance Elite forks use higher-end FIT4 or FIT GRIP 2 dampers. Performance Elite is functionally the same as Factory forks but the stanchions use a black finish instead of the gold Kashima coat used on Factory forks. 

High-End: Factory
Factory is the highest level of FOX fork and it is priced accordingly. All models use higher-end FIT4 or FIT GRIP 2 dampers. Factory forks are recognizable due to the distinctive gold Kashima coating on the stanchions to reduce friction and increase wear life. Factory forks are also available in FOX special signature orange color. 


RockShox forks are offered in various trims within high-end and entry-level models. E.g., a RockShox Pike will be available as a Pike RC, Pike RCT3, Pike Select, Pike Select+, or Pike Ultimate.

For 2020 suspension products, RockShox has simplified its naming conventions. New forks are classified as Select, Select+, and Ultimate. Older forks are designated RC/RL or RCT3/RLC, which relates to their damping systems. 

Entry Level: RC / RL / Select
RC forks are generally trail- or enduro-focused. They are OEM forks that only come on complete bikes and are generally not available to be purchased aftermarket. They come with external rebound and low-speed compression adjustment.

RL forks are generally cross-country-focused and offer rebound damping adjustment plus an open or lock compression setting that can be controlled by an optional remote.

Newer Select level forks will feature Charger RC or Charger RL dampers.

Mid-High Level: RCT3 / RLC / Select+
RCT3 forks are generally trail- or enduro-focused. They use the Charger 2 damper with a three-position lock-pedal-open compression adjust lever with low-speed compression adjustment in the open mode.

RLC are generally cross country focused. They add low-speed compression adjustment to the lockout and rebound adjustments.

Newer Select+ level Lyrik and Pike forks use the new Charger 2.1 damper.

High-End: Ultimate
Ultimate is RockShox’s newest top-end option using the new Charger 2.1 damper, as well as new low friction SKF seals and Maxima damping fluid to decrease stiction. Ultimate forks come in either an RCT3 or RLC version with the same adjustments described above, or a new RC2 version with high and low-speed compression damping adjustment as well as rebound. Ultimate forks are also available in various RockShox signature colors. 

High-End: SID Ultimate Carbon / World Cup
The SID is the only model available in Ultimate Carbon (formerly called World Cup) trim. It is the premier cross-country fork in the SID range. It uses the same damper as the SID Ultimate/RLC but uses a carbon fiber crown to further reduce weight.



Fox RockShox mountain bike fork dampersThe damper lives in the right fork leg of FOX and RockShox forks. Here, oil and valving controls the speed and behavior of the fork as it compresses and extends. As described in the Performance Hierarchy, different forks use different dampers depending on their trim. All dampers listed below are adjustable to suit rider preferences and terrain. 


FIT stands for "Fox Isolated Technology."

The GRIP damper is fitted to more affordable models in the FOX fork range. It has a compression damping adjustment lever on the top cap. It’s based on FIT4 technology, but instead of a bladder, the damper cartridge uses a spring-loaded IFP (Internal Floating Piston) to prevent the mixing of air and oil. It is a simpler design than the FIT4, and it’s a bit heavier.

FIT4 is one of FOX's premium cartridge dampers. It has a three-position compression adjust lever on the top cap with a climb, trail, and open (descend) mode. Low-speed compression can be fine-tuned in the open mode with a black knob in the center of the top cap lever. There is also a two-position remote lockout version available that uses a remote to switch between a climb and open mode. It uses a sealed design with a rubber bladder to compensate for displaced oil as the damper cycles through the travel.

This is the damper used on FOX’s newest gravity forks (FOX 36 / FOX 40 / FOX 49). It’s similar in design to the entry-level FIT GRIP damper but it has much more adjustment. It offers high- and low-speed compression damping adjustment and independent high and low-speed rebound damping adjustment. It uses an IFP instead of a bladder but also has more advanced valve technology and various friction-reducing treatments not seen in the standard GRIP damper.

Live Valve
FOX Live Valve is an electronically controlled suspension system. It uses ultra-fast reacting sensors to automatically control and adjust the fork and shock. Sensors are strategically placed on the frame and wheels and they allow a Live Valve Controller to process data from the terrain to constantly adjust the suspension for maximum efficiency and control. Live Valve's default is closed — the equivalent of you running your shock and fork in the climb mode. The Controller only opens the suspension during an impact, and then switches back to firm after impact. Live Valve is currently only available on a few select, high-end mountain bikes. 


Motion Control
Motion Control is an entry/mid-level damper that comes with either a compression adjustment lever on the top cap or a remote lockout. Motion Control is an emulsion damper, which means the damping oil isn't separated from the air in the fork by an IFP or bladder. This is simpler and less expensive to produce. It functions well, but it can lead to less precisely controlled damping under more extreme use.

Charger RC / RL
Charger RC / RL is a version of the Charger damper that RockShox describes as 'cartridge-style' rather than a fully sealed cartridge damper. It is intended to split the difference between the Motion Control and Charger 2 damper, offering Charger damper technology in a more affordable package. It has adjustable rebound and adjustable low-speed compression (RC) or a remote lockout (RL).

Charger 2
Charger 2 is RockShox’s high-end damper. It's a fully sealed cartridge damper unit that uses a bladder to keep the damping oil isolated from the air. It's available in different versions depending on the application.

RC/RL/Select Charger 2 dampers have adjustable rebound and adjustable low-speed compression (RC) or a remote lockout (RL).

RCT3/RLC/Select+ Charger 2 dampers use a three-position compression adjuster with lock, pedal, and open modes (RCT3) or a remote lockout that uses a remote to switch between a lock and open mode (RLC). Low-speed compression can be fine-tuned in the open mode with a black knob in the center of the top cap lever.

RC2 Charger 2 dampers have adjustable high and low-speed compression damping plus rebound. This is only used on dedicated gravity forks (Lyrik and BoXXer).

Charger 2.1
This is an updated version of the Charger 2 damper seen on Ultimate forks and Select+ Lyrik and Pike forks. It changes some of the Charger 2 valving so there is less high-speed compression damping and more low-speed compression damping to make the fork ride higher in its travel and improve downhill performance.

It uses a new piston wear band inside the damper to manage oil flow better and a new rod seal from SKF to reduce friction by over 30% at the rebound shaft.

It is available in RCT3 and RC2 versions, with the same adjusters as the regular Charger 2 range.

Volume reduction

The resistance felt when compressing a fork is provided by an air spring in the left fork leg. This is an air chamber that compresses as the fork moves into its travel. All FOX forks and the majority of RockShox forks allow the user to control how progressive the ending stroke of the fork is by reducing the volume of the air spring.

It is an easy job for novice mechanics. To do this you must release the air from the fork and undo the top cap of the fork's air spring side leg using the correctly sized spanner or splined cassette tool. Volume reduction spacers are then attached to the underside of the top cap. You can put multiple spacers into a fork as they clip or thread together.

Mountain Bike fork volume reducers spacers tokensAt a given air pressure, adding more spacers will increase the resistance to bottoming out, while removing spacers will do the opposite, making it easier to achieve full travel. Determining how many you need or want may require experimentation and will largely depend on your riding style, terrain, skill, speed, and preferences.

Volume spacers are specific to fork models and color-coded to match. RockShox refers to volume spacers as “Bottomless Tokens.”


Stanchion coatings

Fox kashima Rockshox fast black stanchion coatingsKashima coat (left) / Fast Black with sag gradients on inside of left stanchion (right)

Fork stanchions are generally coated using some form of anodizing surface treatment. Stanchion coatings lubricate the stanchions and seals to reduce fork stiction and provide a hard scratch-resistance surface to prevent damage.

FOX Factory forks use a distinctive gold coating on the stanchions called a Kashima Coating. Kashima is a hard-anodized surface treatment created by Miyaka Company of Japan. It uses lubricating molybdenum disulfide deposited via electrical induction into the billions of micropores on the surface of hard-anodized aluminum for better lubrication and less abrasion and wear. 

Many will select factory level forks simply because they enjoy the aesthetics of the gold Kashima coat. All other non-Factory FOX forks currently use a standard black stanchion coating. It is debatable whether Kashima actually improves fork feel or performance enough to be noticeable to the average rider.

All RockShox forks use a black stanchion coating called Fast Black. RockShox Stanchions also have sag gradients printed directly on the stanchions. This is unique to RockShox forks. These sag gradients make it quick and easy to determine sag without using a measuring tool like a ruler.

Stanchion diameter

In general, more cross country-oriented forks use narrower diameter stanchions to reduce weight. Most cross country forks use stanchions that are 32mm in diameter. More enduro oriented forks use thicker diameter stanchions that are 35-36mm in diameter to increase stiffness which improves performance in rough terrain. Trail oriented forks try to compromise between weight and stiffness. Most trail focused forks use stanchions that are 34-35mm in diameter.

FOX names its forks based on stanchion diameter (e.g., FOX 32 is a 32mm stanchion cross country fork), so it is easy to discern each FOX fork’s stanchion diameter and intended use. For RockShox forks, refer to the RockShox suspension fork list to determine what diameter stanchions specific fork models use. 

Torque Cap end caps

End caps are the part of the bicycle wheel hub that comes in contact with the fork dropouts or rear dropouts of a frame. A wheel is held on to a fork or frame with an axle that goes through the end caps. For most mountain bikes this axle will come in the form of a threaded thru-axle.

RockShox SRAM Torque Cap end capsMany current RockShox forks will accept Torque Cap end caps. Torque Caps were developed by RockShox. They are larger than standard end caps and have more surface area in contact with the fork. This is intended to improve front end stiffness.

Several hubs on the market can swap standard end caps with Torque Cap end caps (check with your hub manufacturer). FOX forks cannot accept wheels with Torque Cap end caps installed. RockShox forks compatible with Torque Cap end caps can still accept wheels with standard end caps.

Signature colors

Fox and RockShox factory fork colors Shiny orange gloss silver boxxer redShiny Orange (left) / Gloss Silver (center) / BoXXer Red (right)

Most forks come with black lowers but FOX and RockShox currently offer unique signature colors so riders can personalize the look of their bikes.

FOX’s signature color is called Shiney Orange. It is only available for Factory-level forks.  

RockShox currently offers BoXXer Red for the Lyrik Ultimate and BoXXer forks, SID Blue for the SID Ultimate, and Gloss Silver for the Pike Ultimate. Older models may have slightly different color options (e.g., BoXXer Red and Fluorescent Yellow for previous SID models).

Finally, we'd be remiss if we didn't mention the iconic yellow of RockShox's Judy SL from the 1990s. Although RockShox doesn't currently have a fork in its line-up in this eye-catching color, maybe someday it will be rebooted for a special occasion.

Service intervals

FOX only has one service interval for its products: after 125 hours of riding or annually, whichever comes first.

RockShox recommends lower leg service on forks after a maximum of 50 hours of riding. It recommends damper and spring service for most modern forks after 200 hours maximum.


World Cup race results

The UCI World Cup is the pinnacle of cross country (XC) and downhill (DH) mountain bike racing. The best riders in the world compete aboard the best gear. FOX and RockShox provide equipment and support for several professional riders and teams competing in these two disciplines. This is where suspension manufacturers develop their technology and prove out their designs.

The charts below show the win rate of fork manufacturers in the XC and DH disciplines over the last five years. It takes into account both the men’s and women’s fields and includes world championship races. Five years is far back enough to be relevant to most buyers looking at purchasing mountain bikes today.

UCI World cup mountain bike XC and DH wins Fox vs RockShox

XC World Cup wins show that RockShox has been the dominant XC fork manufacturer, winning 54% of races over the last five years. The RockShox SID has been one of the top XC forks since its inception in 1998. It also has the benefit of being the fork equipped on the Specialized Epic, one of the most successful XC race bikes of the modern era. RockShox has been a strong force in top-level XC racing since its first World Championship in 1990 with Ned Overend. 

It is interesting to note that DT Swiss, whose suspension products are uncommon in the U.S., has a higher win rate than FOX. That this can largely be attributed to three riders — Nino Schurter, Yana Belomoina, Jolanda Neff. Nino Schurter is one of the most successful XC racers of all time and has scored numerous wins, World Championships, World Cup overalls, and Olympic Gold while using DT Swiss suspension. He and his team switched to RockShox in 2017 and he has contributed several wins and championships for RockShox as well. Yana Belomoina and Jolanda Neff won several races on DT Swiss forks on the way to their respective 2017 and 2018 World Cup overall wins. 

DH World Cup wins show that FOX has been the dominant DH fork manufacturer, winning 68.2% of races over the last five years. FOX provides a large amount of factory support for many successful downhill racers and teams. Two of their most notable riders are Rachel Atherton and Aaron Gwin. Rachel Atherton has six World Cup overalls, and five World Championships, and Aaron Gwin has five World Cup overall wins. FOX also supports Greg Minaar, the male downhill racer with the most wins ever. 

Recent wins for RockShox and Ohlins have largely come from two dominant young French riders — Amaury Pierron and Loic Bruni. They are the respective winners of the 2018 and 2019 DH World Cup overalls, and Loic Bruni has won four World Championships in the last five years. They will likely increase the win rates for their respective fork brands in future races. 

This data also only accounts for wins and does not factor in podiums or any other results to create a more detailed and nuanced picture. This data also omits Enduro World Series results, another top-level race series. 

For the average rider, pro racing may have little application to their everyday riding. Pros are exceptionally fast and skilled and they are able to push equipment much harder than most riders. Mountain biking is a sport where equipment matters, but riders make the biggest difference in results. Ultimately, the data here should not be taken as definitive evidence that any manufacturer is superior to another. But professional racing does show how products perform at the absolute limit, which can be powerful for influencing fans and inspiring brand loyalty. It is not uncommon for particular brands to enjoy popularity or become desirable due to the success of pro riders. 


Because The Pro’s Closet is the world leader in buying and selling used bikes, we have substantial data about what bikes are popular and what suspension forks they are equipped with. I dug into our sales for the last 12 months and looked at thousands of different bikes to analyze how FOX and RockShox are performing.

Fox vs RockShox fork salesThe data presented above does not indicate that one brand is "better." It simply shows how bike manufacturers and owners have chosen to equip their bikes over the last few years.

Forks sales by brand shows that we sell more bikes equipped with FOX forks, but the margin isn't exceptional at 9.4%. What we have seen over several years is that FOX and RockShox popularity is relatively even. It will fluctuate slightly, with one pulling ahead of the other from time to time but it will often flip-flop between the two.

It's clear that FOX and RockShox are dominant. The vast majority of other fork brands are only equipped on less than 1% of bikes we sell. The only standouts among this group are Cannondale and Suntour. The Cannondale Lefty has a small cult following and makes up 3.4% of fork sales, while Suntour has carved out a small market share with 2.4% of fork sales.  

Fork sales by model examine how the most popular forks compare to each other and it shows that the FOX 34 is the most popular mountain bike fork by an overwhelming margin. It enjoys over 10% more sales than RockShox's trail forks, the Pike and Revelation. This also tells us that the trail bike category is by far our best-selling mountain bike category. FOX's enduro offering, the FOX 36, follows in third place. XC forks like the FOX 32, SID, and Reba enjoy fewer sales than trail forks. FOX and RockShox are fairly even in the XC category with the FOX 32 outselling the SID and Reba by only 1.2% 

(Note: For Fork Sales by Model, certain RockShox models have been combined based on their intended use. This is because FOX offers a wide range of performance specs for the same model based on trim equivalent to the range RockShox covers using two separate models. E.g., a FOX 34 Rhythm is comparable to a RockShox Revelation RC while a FOX 34 Factory is comparable to a RockShox Pike Ultimate.) 


Final thoughts

Both FOX and RockShox make quality suspension forks. Though their approach to fork design varies slightly, they both produce forks that will perform well enough for the professional racer. And they have options affordable enough for the novice or recreational rider.

Ask any random rider out on the trail and they'll have their own preferences. For the last year, I've been riding the FOX 36 Factory on my enduro bike and FOX 34 Step-Cast Factory on my XC/trail bike. 

Fox 36 Factory Santa Cruz Hightower LT

The year before I rode the RockShox Lyrik RCT3 on my enduro bike and the SID RLC on my XC bike. I have swapped between brands several times, fairly seamlessly, and generally always had good results. In my experience, both brands are reliable, high-performing, and easy to service. 

I'm riding FOX on my current bikes because I'm a sucker for gold stanchions. (But I love the silver legs of the latest Pike Ultimate.) I've come to favor the FOX 36 with the GRIP2 damper for enduro because of the large amount of high and low-speed compression and rebound adjustment. I like to tinker with settings to try and improve downhill performance. The newer Lyrik RC2 damper may be a good alternative. Riders less interested in tuning their forks may prefer a FIT4 damper or the RockShox equivalent which is easier to set up and requires less fiddling.

For XC racing next year, you will likely see me on a RockShox SID select. I don't need all of the tuning features for XC. For an XC race bike that is going to have huge mileage put on it for training, I want something simple and reliable that I won't need to fuss over. After spending time on various forks, I find I have come to prefer the look and feel of the SID and continue to come back to it for XC. 

Shop used mountain bikes 

Are you a FOX or a RockShox rider? Or do you prefer something else entirely? What's your favorite fork to ride? Let us know in the comments!


  • Ok d’accord Fox est un peu plus efficace que RockShox mais le gros avantage de RockShox est que l’on peut faire l’entretien intégralement soi-même et qu’il vaut mieux avoir une fourche haut de gamme entretenue qu’une fourche très haut de gamme avec une lubrification défecteuse. Sinon je vous recommande la marque toulousaine Made In France BOS. C’est du Fox en mieux :)

    Emmanuel LAZORTHES on

  • This is THEE most comprehensive article I’ve read on this subject! FANTASTIC!

    Steve Kim on

  • Great article, I hope it’ll be rated higher and higher in Google to allow newbies like me get all this knowledge before jumping into choices!
    I learned how front suspension is one of the key elements to chose the entire bike, since motors, gears, breaks and other components are today very similar each others.
    Thanks for this, please keep up the good reviews.

    Max on

  • Wow! Whoever wrote this fair play to you! You are an absolute master empowering the mountainbike community with this gem. I just couldn’t stop reading it and learned more about forks in 20mins than I did this past 20 years of downhilling.

    You are very special, not just a brilliant piece of work but a masterpiece.

    Jump High, Jump Hard but always keep Jumping.

    Ronan McShane on

  • Excellent read, very interesting and informative.

    Wayne Proctor on

  • Great aricle. Very helpful. Back in our place, I would consider myself as an old school soft trail rider. I begun with RS Judy, RS Psylo, and currently Fox Talas. I have never destroyed any of them, with due maintenance. I am about to update my ride and honestly I am torn between F34 and RS Pike.

    Arvin on

  • Great article, thanks a lot for your help! See you on the trail 🤘

    Maxime on

  • Good article, enjoyed reading and comparing features on the Fox 36 Factory and RS Pike Ultimate, one of which I’ll choose to upgrade my ‘16 SC Bronson with.
    But two things I noticed missing: 1. weight comparisons (I don’t see fork weights on the respective sites) and 2. QR vs tool axle type. Fox does seem to offer a “tool-less” QR while RS does not? (that’s a bit of a deal breaker for me).
    I’m guessing that this piece has been updated for the ’21 models?

    Bob Loeffler on

  • Форель Радужная свежевыловленная охлажденная Мурманская. У неё нежное розовое мясо оно обладает приятными вкусовыми качествами и оказывает благотворное действие на наш организм. Форель радужная входит в диетические продукты. Купить форель радужную.

    [url=]Купить форель оптом от производителя цена[/url]

    Forelonest on

  • The SID came out in 1996.

    Bubba Smith on

  • Howdy Y’all! I own a Cannondale that was made in Connecticut, I’m lookin to purchase some upgrades, I look forward to seeing what’s available. Thanks

    Derrick VIllanueva on

  • Excellent Article… I guess I am ‘OldSkool’ because I was perplexed that Marzocchi and Manitou (maybe even Avalanche, although I understand why Maverick and Hanebrink and WhiteBrothers, were not even on the list of “other fork companies besides these two, such as DVO, Cane Creek, MRP, Ohlins, and Trust.”

    CrossStuntry on

  • Great info on the 2 heavy hitters in the shock industry, looking to upgrade my fathom 2 2020 from suntour to either fox or rockshox. Being a new be ,it’s a learning experience. Thanks

    James Pilar on

  • Thanks for posting the Great information! It is very helpful!

    Mike on

  • Great article! I personally won’t ever buy Rockshox because their customer service has turned into garbage. Fox has service centers on both coasts and can return a shock within a week. Fox has also done a good job of not charging me lots of money whereas Rockshox I’ve sent in they always want you to upgrade to their newest cartridge….

    Chad T on

  • Wow, great article!

    Pedro SM on

  • trail riding have a gt aggressor 27.5 strait stear tube 80 travel i think what would be a good shock for this bike

    francis on

  • Great info. I’m building an Epic HT and came across this when researching what fork I wanted for my build. I’m leaning toward the SID.

    Quentin on

  • Thanks for clearing that up. In process of looking for a suspension fork for my IBIS SS from the early 90’s. 1” steerer w/10” head tube. I am 6’6” tall 290#. Looking simply to smooth out ride on trails/family rides. Is there a better shock for heavier riders, a shock that still has parts available for rebuild? Any recommendation appreciated. Will likely have to find one with the 4 allen bolts on steerer crown for ease of swapping to longer crown. I believe I found s source for new 1” uncut steerers. Any help appreciated

    Dan Ruland on

  • Hey Grant,

    Thanks for the question. I’m about your weight and your PSI looks about right. I ran the FOX 32s on my last two hardtails a bit stiffer (95-100psi) just because I like it to feel efficient and ride high in the travel, especially with a hardtail. At that psi, I used either no volume spacers or 1 volume spacer. I would try running 1 spacer for a while and if you find that you just can’t get that last bit you want then go ahead and take it out. I personally like to get about 80-90% of travel in my normal riding. I absolutely hate bottoming out so I like to have that last bit of travel left as insurance (e.g., if huck off something big or if I bumble a jump or drop). Also, make sure to actually measure the distance your o-ring is moving from the seal. In my experience, FOX fork stanchions are a bit longer than their listed travel so they don’t actually bottom out at the crown. 100mm on your 32 is probably ~1cm or so below the crown. So you may actually be getting full travel and not know it.  


    I couldn’t fit your head in with the fork! But just look at those beautiful legs.


    Bruce Lin on

  • Thank you for explaining the fork model lineups! Very helpful.

    S Green on

  • Enjoyed reading this article! Thanks.🙂👍 Even though there’s a lot of info, I’ve learned much and have narrowed my choices to “upgrade” my fork on my 18 Chisel XC bike.

    Steven AuBuchon on

  • That was a great write up on both brands. Informative and historical.
    Tons of good information that riders ask me almost daily .
    Suspension can be very confusing. Regardless of brand the more people know about features and options, the better the ride experience will be.
    Why did you cut my head off in the pic?
    Good stuff

    HBall on

  • Very nice, thorough article! I bought a Santa Cruz Highball from you guys a couple of months ago and it came with the Fox Factory 32 Step Cast. This is my first Fox fork and it definitely feels more plush than the SID that I had on my last bike, but I’m having a tough time getting it tuned just right. I’m 180 pounds and haven’t come anywhere near full travel with the psi at 90, even when I’ve ridden very rocky trails at high speeds. I just took the one volume spacer out today to see how that works, but curious what your thoughts are on volume spacers on the 32? Seems like on an XC bike with only 100mm to work with, you’d want to have access to most of the travel .

    Grant Taggart on

  • Hi, im a trail avid rider, 72 years old , and if you need a
    Rolls Royce suspension on your bike ,Fox , is the name.


Leave a comment

Please note, comments must be approved before they are published

Newsletter Sign Up